Renault Modus I phase 2 (JP0) (2008 – 2012)
Reliability score : 8.2/10
The Renault Modus Phase 2 (internal code JP0) marks a decisive turning point in the career of the small diamond-badged minivan. Launched in 2008, this facelift corrects the main flaw of Phase 1: a tiny boot. Renault thus introduced the Grand Modus, extended by 16 cm (4.03 m vs 3.87 m), finally offering cabin space and loading volume worthy of the name. Aesthetically, the front end is modernized (redesigned headlights, refined grille) and perceived quality is up. In terms of reliability, this Phase 2 is an excellent vintage: it benefits from the eradication of serious early-life issues that marred the 2004-2007 models (especially on 1.5 dCi diesels and electronics). It is a pragmatic, comfortable, and economical vehicle, particularly relevant in its Grand Modus version.
✅ Strengths
- Cabin space and boot volume (specific to Grand Modus)
- Sliding and folding rear bench seat (exemplary modularity)
- Excellent overall reliability on this Phase 2 (Phase 1's errors served as a lesson)
- Extremely low fuel consumption of 1.5 dCi engines (often under 5L/100km)
- Suspension comfort and decent sound insulation for the category
- Very affordable insurance and maintenance costs
⚠️ Weaknesses
- Catastrophic mechanical accessibility (changing a headlight bulb often requires removing the front bumper, although slightly improved on Phase 2)
- Very upright driving position ('van' type), steering wheel adjustable only for height
- DP0 automatic gearbox (on 1.6 16v) slow, thirsty, and unreliable
- Hard interior plastics that scratch easily and age moderately
- Boot of the 'short' Modus still too small (prefer the Grand Modus)
🎯 Verdict
The Renault Modus Phase 2 (2008-2012), particularly in its Grand Modus variant, is a highly recommendable used car purchase. Renault has corrected almost all the reliability flaws that ruined the reputation of Phase 1. The 1.5 dCi (85 or 90 hp) engine is at its peak here: freed from its injection and connecting rod problems, it proves to be a tireless workhorse, provided it has been rigorously maintained (regular oil changes, up-to-date belt) and not used exclusively in the city. If your use is purely urban, you should definitely opt for the excellent 1.2 TCe 100 hp or the modest 1.2 16v 75 hp. Simply avoid the automatic gearbox versions (4-speed automatic).
Common issues
Défaillance ou encrassement des injecteurs (moteur 1.5 dCi)
High
🔧 100 000 – 180 000 km
💶 300 – 600 € par injecteur (ou 1 200 – 2 000 € pour jeu complet si limaille)
Vérifier historique entretien, qualité carburant et bruits moteur suspects.
Encrassement vanne EGR et/ou colmatage FAP (filtre à particules)
Medium
🔧 80 000 – 150 000 km
💶 250 – 500 € (EGR) ; 800 – 1 500 € (FAP nettoyage/remplacement)
Privilégier longs trajets, vérifier voyants moteur, entretien régulier.
Défaillance du turbochargeur (moteur 1.5 dCi)
High
🔧 120 000 – 200 000 km
💶 1 000 – 2 000 €
Respecter temps de chauffe/refroidissement, vidanges régulières avec bonne huile.
Usure prématurée des silentblocs et rotules de train avant
Medium
🔧 60 000 – 120 000 km
💶 200 – 500 € (selon pièces et côté)
Tester la direction, écouter bruits anormaux, vérifier usure pneus.
Estimated maintenance costs
| Oil change |
£90 – 160 |
| Timing belt |
£550 – 1 100 |
| Clutch |
£850 – 1 500 |
| Complete brakes |
£300 – 600 |
| Estimated annual budget |
£650 – 1 300 |
Indicative estimates (independent garage, UK market). Prices vary by region and year.